Thursday, September 18, 2014

Week 4


  • Status Report for Week 4
  • Tasks accomplished
    1. Met to work on and complete the SRS document (Whole team, 2 hours)
    2. Created individual HTAs, and collaborated with the team (1 hour, individually)
    3. Finished rough prototype (1 hour, team meeting, and individual time)
  • Tasks In Progress
    1. More fleshed out prototype
  • Tasks Planned For the Next Two Weeks
    1. Elicit users and gather information (each person responsible for 1, half an hour - 1 hour)
    2. Design Document (3-4 hours)
    3. Conceptual prototype (2 hours)
  • Issues
    1. Scheduling with different classes and projects has been difficult, but we have resolved these issues for the most part, and have found a time for most of the team to meet together. 
    2. Differing views on the prototype, has been resolved by working together on the project as a team. 
  • Metrics
    1. Team
      1. SRS (2 hours)
    2. Richard
      1. HTA (.5 hours)
      2. Add on prototype (.5 hours)
    3. Jeremy
      1. HTA (.5 hours)
      2. Add on prototype (.5 hours)
    4. Bill
      1. HTA (.5 hours)
      2. Add on prototype (.5 hours)
    5. Mike
      1. HTA (.5 hours)
    6. Total: 5.5 hours

    Saturday, September 13, 2014

    Week 2 Post

    This week our team accomplished most of the Deliverable 1 SRS document, spending around 3 hours in a team meeting to do so.
    The next week we will finish up Deliverable 1 as a team, we think it will take about 1-2 hours.
    The only risks, challenges and issues our team faces so far is somewhat spotty team meeting attendance by some team members.

    Thursday, September 4, 2014

    Features Post

    Team Cosmonaut
    Richard Ngo
    Jeremy Vasta
    William Spaw
    Michael Kenworthy

    Tasks Accomplished:

    Initial project chosen from list of project proposals - The group came together and picked the Study Group Finder as the project to work on. The Study Group Finder will be a web application that will help students K-12 form study groups, based on subjects they’re having trouble with.

    Feature List -
    Students
    • The ability to create a profile, with a username, password, name, grade, location, email, list of teachers, availability, and list of subjects that help is needed with.
    • An option to show matches with the students schedule, subjects, location, and grades, showing both individual students and groups that match the criteria.
    • The ability to join groups and create new groups

    Teachers:
    • The ability to create a profile with a username, password, name, email address, and list of students
    • The ability to facilitate groups for students

    Groups
    • A group will have a name, a list of students, a subject, a schedule, meeting location, a bulletin board, and a resource repository

    Future Tasks:
    - Recruit four users for next week - Each member of the team will look for 1 or 2 users to recruit - Start on deliverable 1 - The group will work on this together

    Risks, Issues, and Challenges:
    - Deciding on a final project to work on. We had not decided on an idea until late in the week, as there were pros and cons to each of the project proposals.
    - Scheduling was difficult for the team as we were unable to find a time for the whole team to meet